Remove the hugo-nav since it relied on a slow library. The current
build reimplements the absurl functionality based on string replace.
Discovered that my prior implementation missed the requirement for
making absolute paths (/path) absolute with the host, whereas a relative
path is left untouched. Updated the test cases to support this if this
is reimplemented.
Checks to make sure the xml document starts with <?xml. Previously, the
html translate package would write additional details into the document
that caused it to fail.
The render code path would use a fallback if there was an exception.
This change instead relies on explicit declaration of the layout to use
and includes a check to see if the layout indeed exists before
attempting to render it.
Allow content that is not markdown and does not need to be rendered to
exists in the content directory. Currently any valid html or xml
document can exist. Templates are applied to these documents as well.
If you need to have content that doesn't have templates or AbsUrlify
like operations, then continue to put this content in static and it will
be copied over.
I want to move all logic to writing aliases to target so I can pave the
way for writing aliases specific to other runtimes (like .htaccess for
apache or a script for updating AWS or symlinking on a filesystem).
It started with wanting to move templates in template bundles and the
rest followed. I did my best to start grouping related functions
together, but there are some that I missed. There is also the method
Urlize that seems to be a special function used in both worlds. I'll
need to revisit this method.
Tests to ensure rendering dates in templates is working correctly.
Actually, I was running into invalid templates not giving warnings when
I was trying to render a date.
Provide unit test support RenderThing.
One observation is that creating the site.Tmpl variable is a one time
event. site.Tmpl doesn't like additional templates with the same name.
This means that updating a template while in --watch mode requires
throwing away the entire Site object and creating a new one. Not that
this is a bad idea, but it is something I discovered while working on
these unit tests.
