- `.Ref` and `.RelRef` take a reference (the logical filename for a
page, including extension and/or a document fragment ID) and return
a permalink (or relative permalink) to the referenced document.
- If the reference is a page name (such as `about.md`), the page
will be discovered and the permalink will be returned: `/about/`
- If the reference is a page name with a fragment (such as
`about.md#who`), the page will be discovered and used to add the
`page.UniqueID()` to the resulting fragment and permalink:
`/about/#who:deadbeef`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Node` or `SiteInfo`, it will be returned as is: `#who`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Page`, it will be returned with the page’s unique ID:
`#who:deadbeef`.
- `.*Ref` can be called from either `Node`, `SiteInfo` (e.g.,
`Node.Site`), `Page` objects, or `ShortcodeWithPage` objects in
templates.
- `.*Ref` cannot be used in content, so two shortcodes have been
created to provide the functionality to content: `ref` and `relref`.
These are intended to be used within markup, like `[Who]({{% ref
about.md#who %}})` or `<a href="{{% ref about.md#who %}}">Who</a>`.
- There are also `ref` and `relref` template functions (used to create
the shortcodes) that expect a `Page` or `Node` object and the
reference string (e.g., `{{ relref . "about.md" }}` or `{{
"about.md" | ref . }}`). It actually looks for `.*Ref` as defined on
`Node` or `Page` objects.
- Shortcode handling had to use a *differently unique* wrapper in
`createShortcodePlaceholder` because of the way that the `ref` and
`relref` are intended to be used in content.
Some newly added shortcode tests compared maps in assertions.
This failed on Travis, as iteration order isn't guaranteed for maps since Go 1.
This commit fixes that by do a sort of the keys in the shortcode String() function.
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes#565Fixes#480Fixes#461
And probably some others.
If content pages are fully rendered in a list page, footnotes that use
the same reference (`[^fn]`) will have duplicated anchors. This change
builds on #526 to put the page filename (`Page.File.Name`) as part of
the anchor for a footnote.
This would fix discussion [116](http://discuss.gohugo.io/t/footnote-references-are-duplicated-on-list-pages/116).
It started with wanting to move templates in template bundles and the
rest followed. I did my best to start grouping related functions
together, but there are some that I missed. There is also the method
Urlize that seems to be a special function used in both worlds. I'll
need to revisit this method.
