Revert "Refactor: Remove powershell support" with fixes
Thanks to Ben Mezger (@benmezger) for the original code.
See #8122
This reverts commit a7c515e1b5.
This commit fixes some issues where modules in /assets share the same name as in node_modules.
This was not intended, and with this commit the node_modules-components should be isolated. If you want to redefine something inside node_modules, use the `defines` option.
Fixes#7948
This change is mostly motivated to get a more stable CI build (we're building the Hugo site there, with Instagram and Twitter shortcodes sometimes failing).
Fixes#7866
This commit also introduces a convention where these common JS config files, including `package.hugo.json`, gets mounted into:
```
assets/_jsconfig
´``
These files mapped to their real filename will be added to the environment when running PostCSS, Babel etc., so you can do `process.env.HUGO_FILE_TAILWIND_CONFIG_JS` to resolve the real filename.
But do note that `assets` is a composite/union filesystem, so if your config file is not meant to be overridden, name them something specific.
This commit also adds adds `workDir/node_modules` to `NODE_PATH` and `HUGO_WORKDIR` to the env when running the JS tools above.
Fixes#7644Fixes#7656Fixes#7675
Chroma was updated to include a new function to output all CSS
classes without skipping any considered redundant with the current
style.
This will modify the `hugo gen chromastyles` command to use this new
function by default, which avoids potential problems if the style is
later modified.
Also includes requires the updated Chroma (v0.7.2).
Resolves#7167
This more or less completes the simplification of the template handling code in Hugo started in v0.62.
The main motivation was to fix a long lasting issue about a crash in HTML content files without front matter.
But this commit also comes with a big functional improvement.
As we now have moved the base template evaluation to the build stage we now use the same lookup rules for `baseof` as for `list` etc. type of templates.
This means that in this simple example you can have a `baseof` template for the `blog` section without having to duplicate the others:
```
layouts
├── _default
│ ├── baseof.html
│ ├── list.html
│ └── single.html
└── blog
└── baseof.html
```
Also, when simplifying code, you often get rid of some double work, as shown in the "site building" benchmarks below.
These benchmarks looks suspiciously good, but I have repeated the below with ca. the same result. Compared to master:
```
name old time/op new time/op delta
SiteNew/Bundle_with_image-16 13.1ms ± 1% 10.5ms ± 1% -19.34% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Bundle_with_JSON_file-16 13.0ms ± 0% 10.7ms ± 1% -18.05% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Tags_and_categories-16 46.4ms ± 2% 43.1ms ± 1% -7.15% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Canonify_URLs-16 52.2ms ± 2% 47.8ms ± 1% -8.30% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Deep_content_tree-16 77.9ms ± 1% 70.9ms ± 1% -9.01% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Many_HTML_templates-16 43.0ms ± 0% 37.2ms ± 1% -13.54% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Page_collections-16 58.2ms ± 1% 52.4ms ± 1% -9.95% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
SiteNew/Bundle_with_image-16 3.81MB ± 0% 2.22MB ± 0% -41.70% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Bundle_with_JSON_file-16 3.60MB ± 0% 2.01MB ± 0% -44.20% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Tags_and_categories-16 19.3MB ± 1% 14.1MB ± 0% -26.91% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Canonify_URLs-16 70.7MB ± 0% 69.0MB ± 0% -2.40% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Deep_content_tree-16 37.1MB ± 0% 31.2MB ± 0% -15.94% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Many_HTML_templates-16 17.6MB ± 0% 10.6MB ± 0% -39.92% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Page_collections-16 25.9MB ± 0% 21.2MB ± 0% -17.99% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
SiteNew/Bundle_with_image-16 52.3k ± 0% 26.1k ± 0% -50.18% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Bundle_with_JSON_file-16 52.3k ± 0% 26.1k ± 0% -50.16% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Tags_and_categories-16 336k ± 1% 269k ± 0% -19.90% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Canonify_URLs-16 422k ± 0% 395k ± 0% -6.43% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Deep_content_tree-16 401k ± 0% 313k ± 0% -21.79% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Many_HTML_templates-16 247k ± 0% 143k ± 0% -42.17% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
SiteNew/Page_collections-16 282k ± 0% 207k ± 0% -26.55% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
```
Fixes#6716Fixes#6760Fixes#6768Fixes#6778
This is a big commit, but it deletes lots of code and simplifies a lot.
* Resolving the template funcs at execution time means we don't have to create template clones per site
* Having a custom map resolver means that we can remove the AST lower case transformation for the special lower case Params map
Not only is the above easier to reason about, it's also faster, especially if you have more than one language, as in the benchmark below:
```
name old time/op new time/op delta
SiteNew/Deep_content_tree-16 53.7ms ± 0% 48.1ms ± 2% -10.38% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
SiteNew/Deep_content_tree-16 41.0MB ± 0% 36.8MB ± 0% -10.26% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
SiteNew/Deep_content_tree-16 481k ± 0% 410k ± 0% -14.66% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
```
This should be even better if you also have lots of templates.
Closes#6594
Prior refactor had eliminated writing FrontMatter for Jekyll imports. This
fixes that bug as well as adds a regression test.
Also removed unused site var, replaced some raw strings, and added regression
test for \r\n removal.
Fixes#5576
This commit adds the fast and CommonMark compliant Goldmark as the new default markdown handler in Hugo.
If you want to continue using BlackFriday as the default for md/markdown extensions, you can use this configuration:
```toml
[markup]
defaultMarkdownHandler="blackfriday"
```
Fixes#5963Fixes#1778Fixes#6355
Many users seem to stumble over creating new sites in existing non-empty directories. And that `--force` is the necessary option. So I added *See --force* as a hint to the error.
Fixes#4825.
