'sort' template function used to accept only each element's struct field
name, method name and map key name as its second argument. This extends
it to accept a field/method/key chaining key string like
'Params.foo.bar' as the argument. It evaluates sub elements of each
array or map elements and sorts by them.
Typical use case would be sorting pages by user defined front matter
value. For example, sorting pages by 'Params.foo.bar' is possible by
writing the following template code
{{ range sort .Data.Pages "Params.foo.bar" }}
{{ .Content }}
{{ end }}
It ignores all leading and trailing dots so "Params.foo.bar" can be
written in ".Params.foo.bar"
This also fixes the issue that 'sort' cannot evaluate a pointer value.
Fix#1330
sort template function returns `[]interface{}` type slice value
regardless of its original element type.
This fixes it to keep the original element type. For example, if it
sorts `map[string]int` type value, it returns `[]int` slice value
instead of `[]interface{}` slice value.
When a YAML/TOML's delimiter character sequence is included in a
frontmatter string, parser mistakes it as a delimiter. This fixes it by
checking a character right before the delimiter sequence is '\n' or it
is the beginning of the frontmatter.
Fix#1320
This simplifies the retrieval of the HTML (no more need to extract the
part within body) and also removes the unwanted "Last Updated" part in
the article.
- Add a step to Contributor instructions for those modifying commands
- Change forum link to http (https does not work)
- Add "Sign the forum release thread" to contributor instructions
The custom sort functions used from the templates had some subtle data race- and related issues,
especially when used in the single page template.
This commit fixes this by making copies and protect the read and writes with a RWMutex.
The results are cached (it will typically be invoked *number of pages* times with exactly the same data).
This is, not surprisingly, also faster:
```
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkSortByWeightAndReverse 14228 491 -96.55%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkSortByWeightAndReverse 1 0 -100.00%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkSortByWeightAndReverse 32 0 -100.00%
```
Fixes#1293
