`where` template function's internal condition check function always
returns `false` when a target value doesn't exist or it's nil value but
this behavior makes it difficult to filter values which doesn't have a
particular parameter.
To solve it, this adds nil value comparison to the function.
`where Values ".Param.key" nil` like clause can be used for the case
above.
Only "=", "==", "eq", "!=", "<>", "ne" operators are allowed to be used
with `nil`. If an other operator is passed with `nil`, the condition
check function returns `false` like before.
Fix#1232
Where `first` will return the first N items of a rangeable list,
`after` will return all items after the Nth item.
This allows the user to do something with the first N items and
something different with the remaining items after N.
`substr` template function takes one or two range arguments. Both
arguments must be int type values but if it is used with a calclation
function e.g. `add`, `len` etc, it causes a wrong type error.
This fixes the issue to allow the function to take other integer type
variant like `int64` etc.
This also includes a small fix on no range argument case.
Fix#1190
`where` tpl function doesn't support `time.Time` type so if people want
to compare such values, it's required that these values are converted
into `int` and compare them.
This improves it. If `time.Time` values are passed to `where`, it
converts them into `int` internally, compares them and returns the
result.
See also
http://discuss.gohugo.io/t/future-posts-and-past-posts/1229/3
Many minor fixes to make test logs more consistent and correct a
mispelling.
Standardize on "[%i] got X but expected Y" for log messages. Using
a consistent layout makes it easier to read the test results. This
was mostly changing "Got" to "got". Swapped the order of values on
several calls to bring them in line with the convention.
A few log messages had a sequence number added to identify the
exact scenario that failed. Otherwise, there would be no way to
ascertain which failed When there are many scenarios.
Correct spelling of "expected."
Fixes#1028
Merged be2097e1ad
[close#1040]
