See #470
* Based on existing support for reStructuredText files
* Handles content files with extensions `.asciidoc` and `.ad`
* Pipes content through `asciidoctor --safe -`.
If `asciidoctor` is not installed, then `asciidoc --safe -`.
* To make sure `asciidoctor` or `asciidoc` is found, after adding
a piece of AsciiDoc content, run `hugo` with the `-v` flag
and look for this message:
INFO: 2015/01/23 Rendering with /usr/bin/asciidoctor ...
Caveats:
* The final "Last updated" timestamp is currently not stripped.
* When `hugo` is run with `-v`, you may see a lot of these messages
INFO: 2015/01/23 Rendering with /usr/bin/asciidoctor ...
if you have lots of `*.ad`, `*.adoc` or `*.asciidoc` files.
* Some versions of `asciidoc` may have trouble with its safe mode.
To test if you are affected, try this:
$ echo "Hello" | asciidoc --safe -
asciidoc: ERROR: unsafe: ifeval invalid
asciidoc: FAILED: ifeval invalid safe document
If so, I recommend that you install `asciidoctor` instead.
Feedback and patches welcome!
Ideally, we should be using https://github.com/VonC/asciidocgo,
@VonC's wonderful Go implementation of Asciidoctor. However,
there is still a bit of work needed for asciidocgo to expose
its API so that Hugo can actually use it.
Until then, hope this "experimental AsciiDoc support through external
helpers" can serve as a stopgap solution for our community. :-)
2015-01-30: Updated for the replaceShortcodeTokens() syntax change
2015-02-21: Add `.adoc` extension as suggested by @Fale
Conflicts:
helpers/content.go
The variable scope in the Go templates makes it hard, if possible at all, to write templates with counter variables or similar state.
This commit fixes that by adding a writable context to Node, backed by a map: Scratch.
This context has three methods, Get, Set and Add. The Add is tailored for counter variables, but can be used for any built-in numeric values or strings.
File handling was broken on Windows. This commit contains a revision of the path handling with separation of file paths and urls where needed.
There may be remaining issues and there may be better ways to do this, but it is easier to start that refactoring job with a set of passing tests.
Fixes#687Fixes#660
