2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// Copyright 2017 The Hugo Authors. All rights reserved.
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
2015-11-23 22:16:36 -05:00
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
|
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
2015-11-23 22:16:36 -05:00
|
|
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
|
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
|
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
|
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
|
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package hugolib
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
2015-06-21 07:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
|
|
|
"errors"
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
"html/template"
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
"reflect"
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
"regexp"
|
2014-11-18 04:20:52 -05:00
|
|
|
|
"sort"
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
"strings"
|
2015-01-21 13:13:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
"sync"
|
2014-11-20 12:32:21 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-13 12:42:45 -04:00
|
|
|
|
"github.com/gohugoio/hugo/output"
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-13 12:42:45 -04:00
|
|
|
|
"github.com/gohugoio/hugo/media"
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-13 12:42:45 -04:00
|
|
|
|
bp "github.com/gohugoio/hugo/bufferpool"
|
|
|
|
|
"github.com/gohugoio/hugo/helpers"
|
|
|
|
|
"github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl"
|
2014-03-31 13:23:34 -04:00
|
|
|
|
)
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-24 09:11:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// ShortcodeWithPage is the "." context in a shortcode template.
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
type ShortcodeWithPage struct {
|
2015-11-20 19:59:54 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Params interface{}
|
|
|
|
|
Inner template.HTML
|
2018-04-19 12:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Page *PageWithoutContent
|
2016-03-08 14:56:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Parent *ShortcodeWithPage
|
2015-11-20 19:59:54 -05:00
|
|
|
|
IsNamedParams bool
|
2018-04-23 02:09:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-27 15:34:05 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// Zero-based ordinal in relation to its parent. If the parent is the page itself,
|
|
|
|
|
// this ordinal will represent the position of this shortcode in the page content.
|
2018-04-23 02:09:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Ordinal int
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scratch *Scratch
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-24 09:11:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// Site returns information about the current site.
|
2016-03-14 09:10:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func (scp *ShortcodeWithPage) Site() *SiteInfo {
|
|
|
|
|
return scp.Page.Site
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-24 09:11:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// Ref is a shortcut to the Ref method on Page.
|
Provide (relative) reference funcs & shortcodes.
- `.Ref` and `.RelRef` take a reference (the logical filename for a
page, including extension and/or a document fragment ID) and return
a permalink (or relative permalink) to the referenced document.
- If the reference is a page name (such as `about.md`), the page
will be discovered and the permalink will be returned: `/about/`
- If the reference is a page name with a fragment (such as
`about.md#who`), the page will be discovered and used to add the
`page.UniqueID()` to the resulting fragment and permalink:
`/about/#who:deadbeef`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Node` or `SiteInfo`, it will be returned as is: `#who`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Page`, it will be returned with the page’s unique ID:
`#who:deadbeef`.
- `.*Ref` can be called from either `Node`, `SiteInfo` (e.g.,
`Node.Site`), `Page` objects, or `ShortcodeWithPage` objects in
templates.
- `.*Ref` cannot be used in content, so two shortcodes have been
created to provide the functionality to content: `ref` and `relref`.
These are intended to be used within markup, like `[Who]({{% ref
about.md#who %}})` or `<a href="{{% ref about.md#who %}}">Who</a>`.
- There are also `ref` and `relref` template functions (used to create
the shortcodes) that expect a `Page` or `Node` object and the
reference string (e.g., `{{ relref . "about.md" }}` or `{{
"about.md" | ref . }}`). It actually looks for `.*Ref` as defined on
`Node` or `Page` objects.
- Shortcode handling had to use a *differently unique* wrapper in
`createShortcodePlaceholder` because of the way that the `ref` and
`relref` are intended to be used in content.
2014-11-24 01:15:34 -05:00
|
|
|
|
func (scp *ShortcodeWithPage) Ref(ref string) (string, error) {
|
|
|
|
|
return scp.Page.Ref(ref)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-24 09:11:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// RelRef is a shortcut to the RelRef method on Page.
|
Provide (relative) reference funcs & shortcodes.
- `.Ref` and `.RelRef` take a reference (the logical filename for a
page, including extension and/or a document fragment ID) and return
a permalink (or relative permalink) to the referenced document.
- If the reference is a page name (such as `about.md`), the page
will be discovered and the permalink will be returned: `/about/`
- If the reference is a page name with a fragment (such as
`about.md#who`), the page will be discovered and used to add the
`page.UniqueID()` to the resulting fragment and permalink:
`/about/#who:deadbeef`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Node` or `SiteInfo`, it will be returned as is: `#who`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Page`, it will be returned with the page’s unique ID:
`#who:deadbeef`.
- `.*Ref` can be called from either `Node`, `SiteInfo` (e.g.,
`Node.Site`), `Page` objects, or `ShortcodeWithPage` objects in
templates.
- `.*Ref` cannot be used in content, so two shortcodes have been
created to provide the functionality to content: `ref` and `relref`.
These are intended to be used within markup, like `[Who]({{% ref
about.md#who %}})` or `<a href="{{% ref about.md#who %}}">Who</a>`.
- There are also `ref` and `relref` template functions (used to create
the shortcodes) that expect a `Page` or `Node` object and the
reference string (e.g., `{{ relref . "about.md" }}` or `{{
"about.md" | ref . }}`). It actually looks for `.*Ref` as defined on
`Node` or `Page` objects.
- Shortcode handling had to use a *differently unique* wrapper in
`createShortcodePlaceholder` because of the way that the `ref` and
`relref` are intended to be used in content.
2014-11-24 01:15:34 -05:00
|
|
|
|
func (scp *ShortcodeWithPage) RelRef(ref string) (string, error) {
|
|
|
|
|
return scp.Page.RelRef(ref)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-24 09:11:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// Scratch returns a scratch-pad scoped for this shortcode. This can be used
|
|
|
|
|
// as a temporary storage for variables, counters etc.
|
2015-04-19 08:50:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func (scp *ShortcodeWithPage) Scratch() *Scratch {
|
2016-03-21 06:10:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if scp.scratch == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
scp.scratch = newScratch()
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return scp.scratch
|
2015-04-19 08:50:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-24 09:11:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// Get is a convenience method to look up shortcode parameters by its key.
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
func (scp *ShortcodeWithPage) Get(key interface{}) interface{} {
|
2016-07-21 11:18:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if scp.Params == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
if reflect.ValueOf(scp.Params).Len() == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var x reflect.Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch key.(type) {
|
|
|
|
|
case int64, int32, int16, int8, int:
|
|
|
|
|
if reflect.TypeOf(scp.Params).Kind() == reflect.Map {
|
2018-05-21 11:47:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// We treat this as a non error, so people can do similar to
|
|
|
|
|
// {{ $myParam := .Get "myParam" | default .Get 0 }}
|
|
|
|
|
// Without having to do additional checks.
|
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
} else if reflect.TypeOf(scp.Params).Kind() == reflect.Slice {
|
2015-08-07 13:21:26 -04:00
|
|
|
|
idx := int(reflect.ValueOf(key).Int())
|
|
|
|
|
ln := reflect.ValueOf(scp.Params).Len()
|
|
|
|
|
if idx > ln-1 {
|
2018-04-17 05:24:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return ""
|
2015-08-07 13:21:26 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
x = reflect.ValueOf(scp.Params).Index(idx)
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
case string:
|
|
|
|
|
if reflect.TypeOf(scp.Params).Kind() == reflect.Map {
|
|
|
|
|
x = reflect.ValueOf(scp.Params).MapIndex(reflect.ValueOf(key))
|
|
|
|
|
if !x.IsValid() {
|
|
|
|
|
return ""
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
} else if reflect.TypeOf(scp.Params).Kind() == reflect.Slice {
|
2018-05-21 11:47:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// We treat this as a non error, so people can do similar to
|
|
|
|
|
// {{ $myParam := .Get "myParam" | default .Get 0 }}
|
|
|
|
|
// Without having to do additional checks.
|
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch x.Kind() {
|
|
|
|
|
case reflect.String:
|
|
|
|
|
return x.String()
|
|
|
|
|
case reflect.Int64, reflect.Int32, reflect.Int16, reflect.Int8, reflect.Int:
|
|
|
|
|
return x.Int()
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
|
return x
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// Note - this value must not contain any markup syntax
|
|
|
|
|
const shortcodePlaceholderPrefix = "HUGOSHORTCODE"
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
type shortcode struct {
|
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
|
inner []interface{} // string or nested shortcode
|
|
|
|
|
params interface{} // map or array
|
2018-04-23 02:09:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
ordinal int
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
err error
|
|
|
|
|
doMarkup bool
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func (sc shortcode) String() string {
|
|
|
|
|
// for testing (mostly), so any change here will break tests!
|
2014-11-18 04:20:52 -05:00
|
|
|
|
var params interface{}
|
|
|
|
|
switch v := sc.params.(type) {
|
|
|
|
|
case map[string]string:
|
|
|
|
|
// sort the keys so test assertions won't fail
|
|
|
|
|
var keys []string
|
|
|
|
|
for k := range v {
|
|
|
|
|
keys = append(keys, k)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
sort.Strings(keys)
|
|
|
|
|
var tmp = make([]string, len(keys))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for i, k := range keys {
|
|
|
|
|
tmp[i] = k + ":" + v[k]
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
params = tmp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
|
// use it as is
|
|
|
|
|
params = sc.params
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Sprintf("%s(%q, %t){%s}", sc.name, params, sc.doMarkup, sc.inner)
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-12-06 23:14:54 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// We may have special shortcode templates for AMP etc.
|
|
|
|
|
// Note that in the below, OutputFormat may be empty.
|
|
|
|
|
// We will try to look for the most specific shortcode template available.
|
|
|
|
|
type scKey struct {
|
2017-07-02 04:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Lang string
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
OutputFormat string
|
|
|
|
|
Suffix string
|
|
|
|
|
ShortcodePlaceholder string
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func newScKey(m media.Type, shortcodeplaceholder string) scKey {
|
|
|
|
|
return scKey{Suffix: m.Suffix, ShortcodePlaceholder: shortcodeplaceholder}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-02 04:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func newScKeyFromLangAndOutputFormat(lang string, o output.Format, shortcodeplaceholder string) scKey {
|
|
|
|
|
return scKey{Lang: lang, Suffix: o.MediaType.Suffix, OutputFormat: o.Name, ShortcodePlaceholder: shortcodeplaceholder}
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func newDefaultScKey(shortcodeplaceholder string) scKey {
|
|
|
|
|
return newScKey(media.HTMLType, shortcodeplaceholder)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
type shortcodeHandler struct {
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
init sync.Once
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-19 12:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
p *PageWithoutContent
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This is all shortcode rendering funcs for all potential output formats.
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
contentShortcodes *orderedMap
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This map contains the new or changed set of shortcodes that need
|
|
|
|
|
// to be rendered for the current output format.
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
contentShortcodesDelta *orderedMap
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This maps the shorcode placeholders with the rendered content.
|
|
|
|
|
// We will do (potential) partial re-rendering per output format,
|
|
|
|
|
// so keep this for the unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
renderedShortcodes map[string]string
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Maps the shortcodeplaceholder with the actual shortcode.
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
shortcodes *orderedMap
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// All the shortcode names in this set.
|
|
|
|
|
nameSet map[string]bool
|
2018-04-19 12:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
placeholderID int
|
|
|
|
|
placeholderFunc func() string
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *shortcodeHandler) nextPlaceholderID() int {
|
|
|
|
|
s.placeholderID++
|
|
|
|
|
return s.placeholderID
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *shortcodeHandler) createShortcodePlaceholder() string {
|
|
|
|
|
if s.placeholderFunc != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
return s.placeholderFunc()
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Sprintf("HAHA%s-%p-%d-HBHB", shortcodePlaceholderPrefix, s.p.Page, s.nextPlaceholderID())
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func newShortcodeHandler(p *Page) *shortcodeHandler {
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
return &shortcodeHandler{
|
2018-04-19 12:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
p: p.withoutContent(),
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
contentShortcodes: newOrderedMap(),
|
|
|
|
|
shortcodes: newOrderedMap(),
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
nameSet: make(map[string]bool),
|
|
|
|
|
renderedShortcodes: make(map[string]string),
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO(bep) make it non-global
|
2015-01-21 13:13:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
var isInnerShortcodeCache = struct {
|
|
|
|
|
sync.RWMutex
|
|
|
|
|
m map[string]bool
|
|
|
|
|
}{m: make(map[string]bool)}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// to avoid potential costly look-aheads for closing tags we look inside the template itself
|
|
|
|
|
// we could change the syntax to self-closing tags, but that would make users cry
|
|
|
|
|
// the value found is cached
|
2017-03-27 14:43:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func isInnerShortcode(t tpl.TemplateExecutor) (bool, error) {
|
2015-01-21 13:13:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
isInnerShortcodeCache.RLock()
|
|
|
|
|
m, ok := isInnerShortcodeCache.m[t.Name()]
|
|
|
|
|
isInnerShortcodeCache.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ok {
|
2015-11-21 17:29:58 -05:00
|
|
|
|
return m, nil
|
2014-06-26 16:47:51 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-21 13:13:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
isInnerShortcodeCache.Lock()
|
2015-02-20 11:41:37 -05:00
|
|
|
|
defer isInnerShortcodeCache.Unlock()
|
2017-03-27 14:43:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
match, _ := regexp.MatchString("{{.*?\\.Inner.*?}}", t.Tree())
|
2015-01-21 13:13:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
isInnerShortcodeCache.m[t.Name()] = match
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-21 17:29:58 -05:00
|
|
|
|
return match, nil
|
2013-12-06 23:14:54 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
func clearIsInnerShortcodeCache() {
|
|
|
|
|
isInnerShortcodeCache.Lock()
|
|
|
|
|
defer isInnerShortcodeCache.Unlock()
|
|
|
|
|
isInnerShortcodeCache.m = make(map[string]bool)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide (relative) reference funcs & shortcodes.
- `.Ref` and `.RelRef` take a reference (the logical filename for a
page, including extension and/or a document fragment ID) and return
a permalink (or relative permalink) to the referenced document.
- If the reference is a page name (such as `about.md`), the page
will be discovered and the permalink will be returned: `/about/`
- If the reference is a page name with a fragment (such as
`about.md#who`), the page will be discovered and used to add the
`page.UniqueID()` to the resulting fragment and permalink:
`/about/#who:deadbeef`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Node` or `SiteInfo`, it will be returned as is: `#who`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Page`, it will be returned with the page’s unique ID:
`#who:deadbeef`.
- `.*Ref` can be called from either `Node`, `SiteInfo` (e.g.,
`Node.Site`), `Page` objects, or `ShortcodeWithPage` objects in
templates.
- `.*Ref` cannot be used in content, so two shortcodes have been
created to provide the functionality to content: `ref` and `relref`.
These are intended to be used within markup, like `[Who]({{% ref
about.md#who %}})` or `<a href="{{% ref about.md#who %}}">Who</a>`.
- There are also `ref` and `relref` template functions (used to create
the shortcodes) that expect a `Page` or `Node` object and the
reference string (e.g., `{{ relref . "about.md" }}` or `{{
"about.md" | ref . }}`). It actually looks for `.*Ref` as defined on
`Node` or `Page` objects.
- Shortcode handling had to use a *differently unique* wrapper in
`createShortcodePlaceholder` because of the way that the `ref` and
`relref` are intended to be used in content.
2014-11-24 01:15:34 -05:00
|
|
|
|
const innerNewlineRegexp = "\n"
|
|
|
|
|
const innerCleanupRegexp = `\A<p>(.*)</p>\n\z`
|
|
|
|
|
const innerCleanupExpand = "$1"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func prepareShortcodeForPage(placeholder string, sc *shortcode, parent *ShortcodeWithPage, p *PageWithoutContent) map[scKey]func() (string, error) {
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m := make(map[scKey]func() (string, error))
|
2017-07-02 04:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
lang := p.Lang()
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, f := range p.outputFormats {
|
|
|
|
|
// The most specific template will win.
|
2017-07-02 04:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
key := newScKeyFromLangAndOutputFormat(lang, f, placeholder)
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
m[key] = func() (string, error) {
|
|
|
|
|
return renderShortcode(key, sc, nil, p), nil
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return m
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func renderShortcode(
|
|
|
|
|
tmplKey scKey,
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
sc *shortcode,
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
parent *ShortcodeWithPage,
|
2018-04-19 12:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
p *PageWithoutContent) string {
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tmpl := getShortcodeTemplateForTemplateKey(tmplKey, sc.name, p.s.Tmpl)
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if tmpl == nil {
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
p.s.Log.ERROR.Printf("Unable to locate template for shortcode %q in page %q", sc.name, p.Path())
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return ""
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-23 02:09:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
data := &ShortcodeWithPage{Ordinal: sc.ordinal, Params: sc.params, Page: p, Parent: parent}
|
2015-11-20 19:59:54 -05:00
|
|
|
|
if sc.params != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
data.IsNamedParams = reflect.TypeOf(sc.params).Kind() == reflect.Map
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if len(sc.inner) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
var inner string
|
|
|
|
|
for _, innerData := range sc.inner {
|
|
|
|
|
switch innerData.(type) {
|
|
|
|
|
case string:
|
|
|
|
|
inner += innerData.(string)
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
case *shortcode:
|
|
|
|
|
inner += renderShortcode(tmplKey, innerData.(*shortcode), data, p)
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
default:
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
p.s.Log.ERROR.Printf("Illegal state on shortcode rendering of %q in page %q. Illegal type in inner data: %s ",
|
|
|
|
|
sc.name, p.Path(), reflect.TypeOf(innerData))
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return ""
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if sc.doMarkup {
|
2017-02-04 22:20:06 -05:00
|
|
|
|
newInner := p.s.ContentSpec.RenderBytes(&helpers.RenderingContext{
|
2018-05-04 20:17:16 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Content: []byte(inner),
|
|
|
|
|
PageFmt: p.Markup,
|
2017-02-04 22:20:06 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Cfg: p.Language(),
|
|
|
|
|
DocumentID: p.UniqueID(),
|
|
|
|
|
DocumentName: p.Path(),
|
|
|
|
|
Config: p.getRenderingConfig()})
|
Provide (relative) reference funcs & shortcodes.
- `.Ref` and `.RelRef` take a reference (the logical filename for a
page, including extension and/or a document fragment ID) and return
a permalink (or relative permalink) to the referenced document.
- If the reference is a page name (such as `about.md`), the page
will be discovered and the permalink will be returned: `/about/`
- If the reference is a page name with a fragment (such as
`about.md#who`), the page will be discovered and used to add the
`page.UniqueID()` to the resulting fragment and permalink:
`/about/#who:deadbeef`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Node` or `SiteInfo`, it will be returned as is: `#who`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Page`, it will be returned with the page’s unique ID:
`#who:deadbeef`.
- `.*Ref` can be called from either `Node`, `SiteInfo` (e.g.,
`Node.Site`), `Page` objects, or `ShortcodeWithPage` objects in
templates.
- `.*Ref` cannot be used in content, so two shortcodes have been
created to provide the functionality to content: `ref` and `relref`.
These are intended to be used within markup, like `[Who]({{% ref
about.md#who %}})` or `<a href="{{% ref about.md#who %}}">Who</a>`.
- There are also `ref` and `relref` template functions (used to create
the shortcodes) that expect a `Page` or `Node` object and the
reference string (e.g., `{{ relref . "about.md" }}` or `{{
"about.md" | ref . }}`). It actually looks for `.*Ref` as defined on
`Node` or `Page` objects.
- Shortcode handling had to use a *differently unique* wrapper in
`createShortcodePlaceholder` because of the way that the `ref` and
`relref` are intended to be used in content.
2014-11-24 01:15:34 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If the type is “unknown” or “markdown”, we assume the markdown
|
|
|
|
|
// generation has been performed. Given the input: `a line`, markdown
|
|
|
|
|
// specifies the HTML `<p>a line</p>\n`. When dealing with documents as a
|
|
|
|
|
// whole, this is OK. When dealing with an `{{ .Inner }}` block in Hugo,
|
|
|
|
|
// this is not so good. This code does two things:
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// 1. Check to see if inner has a newline in it. If so, the Inner data is
|
|
|
|
|
// unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
// 2 If inner does not have a newline, strip the wrapping <p> block and
|
|
|
|
|
// the newline. This was previously tricked out by wrapping shortcode
|
|
|
|
|
// substitutions in <div>HUGOSHORTCODE-1</div> which prevents the
|
|
|
|
|
// generation, but means that you can’t use shortcodes inside of
|
|
|
|
|
// markdown structures itself (e.g., `[foo]({{% ref foo.md %}})`).
|
2018-05-04 20:17:16 -04:00
|
|
|
|
switch p.Markup {
|
Provide (relative) reference funcs & shortcodes.
- `.Ref` and `.RelRef` take a reference (the logical filename for a
page, including extension and/or a document fragment ID) and return
a permalink (or relative permalink) to the referenced document.
- If the reference is a page name (such as `about.md`), the page
will be discovered and the permalink will be returned: `/about/`
- If the reference is a page name with a fragment (such as
`about.md#who`), the page will be discovered and used to add the
`page.UniqueID()` to the resulting fragment and permalink:
`/about/#who:deadbeef`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Node` or `SiteInfo`, it will be returned as is: `#who`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Page`, it will be returned with the page’s unique ID:
`#who:deadbeef`.
- `.*Ref` can be called from either `Node`, `SiteInfo` (e.g.,
`Node.Site`), `Page` objects, or `ShortcodeWithPage` objects in
templates.
- `.*Ref` cannot be used in content, so two shortcodes have been
created to provide the functionality to content: `ref` and `relref`.
These are intended to be used within markup, like `[Who]({{% ref
about.md#who %}})` or `<a href="{{% ref about.md#who %}}">Who</a>`.
- There are also `ref` and `relref` template functions (used to create
the shortcodes) that expect a `Page` or `Node` object and the
reference string (e.g., `{{ relref . "about.md" }}` or `{{
"about.md" | ref . }}`). It actually looks for `.*Ref` as defined on
`Node` or `Page` objects.
- Shortcode handling had to use a *differently unique* wrapper in
`createShortcodePlaceholder` because of the way that the `ref` and
`relref` are intended to be used in content.
2014-11-24 01:15:34 -05:00
|
|
|
|
case "unknown", "markdown":
|
|
|
|
|
if match, _ := regexp.MatchString(innerNewlineRegexp, inner); !match {
|
|
|
|
|
cleaner, err := regexp.Compile(innerCleanupRegexp)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
newInner = cleaner.ReplaceAll(newInner, []byte(innerCleanupExpand))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// TODO(bep) we may have plain text inner templates.
|
Provide (relative) reference funcs & shortcodes.
- `.Ref` and `.RelRef` take a reference (the logical filename for a
page, including extension and/or a document fragment ID) and return
a permalink (or relative permalink) to the referenced document.
- If the reference is a page name (such as `about.md`), the page
will be discovered and the permalink will be returned: `/about/`
- If the reference is a page name with a fragment (such as
`about.md#who`), the page will be discovered and used to add the
`page.UniqueID()` to the resulting fragment and permalink:
`/about/#who:deadbeef`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Node` or `SiteInfo`, it will be returned as is: `#who`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Page`, it will be returned with the page’s unique ID:
`#who:deadbeef`.
- `.*Ref` can be called from either `Node`, `SiteInfo` (e.g.,
`Node.Site`), `Page` objects, or `ShortcodeWithPage` objects in
templates.
- `.*Ref` cannot be used in content, so two shortcodes have been
created to provide the functionality to content: `ref` and `relref`.
These are intended to be used within markup, like `[Who]({{% ref
about.md#who %}})` or `<a href="{{% ref about.md#who %}}">Who</a>`.
- There are also `ref` and `relref` template functions (used to create
the shortcodes) that expect a `Page` or `Node` object and the
reference string (e.g., `{{ relref . "about.md" }}` or `{{
"about.md" | ref . }}`). It actually looks for `.*Ref` as defined on
`Node` or `Page` objects.
- Shortcode handling had to use a *differently unique* wrapper in
`createShortcodePlaceholder` because of the way that the `ref` and
`relref` are intended to be used in content.
2014-11-24 01:15:34 -05:00
|
|
|
|
data.Inner = template.HTML(newInner)
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
data.Inner = template.HTML(inner)
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-17 18:40:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return renderShortcodeWithPage(tmpl, data)
|
2014-02-25 23:57:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// The delta represents new output format-versions of the shortcodes,
|
|
|
|
|
// which, combined with the ones that do not have alternative representations,
|
|
|
|
|
// builds a complete set ready for a full rebuild of the Page content.
|
|
|
|
|
// This method returns false if there are no new shortcode variants in the
|
|
|
|
|
// current rendering context's output format. This mean we can safely reuse
|
|
|
|
|
// the content from the previous output format, if any.
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *shortcodeHandler) updateDelta() bool {
|
|
|
|
|
s.init.Do(func() {
|
2018-04-19 12:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
s.contentShortcodes = createShortcodeRenderers(s.shortcodes, s.p.withoutContent())
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-23 23:57:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if !s.p.shouldRenderTo(s.p.s.rc.Format) {
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO(bep) add test for this re translations
|
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
of := s.p.s.rc.Format
|
|
|
|
|
contentShortcodes := s.contentShortcodesForOutputFormat(of)
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if s.contentShortcodesDelta == nil || s.contentShortcodesDelta.Len() == 0 {
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
s.contentShortcodesDelta = contentShortcodes
|
|
|
|
|
return true
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
delta := newOrderedMap()
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
for _, k := range contentShortcodes.Keys() {
|
|
|
|
|
if !s.contentShortcodesDelta.Contains(k) {
|
|
|
|
|
v, _ := contentShortcodes.Get(k)
|
|
|
|
|
delta.Add(k, v)
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-03-17 10:51:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
s.contentShortcodesDelta = delta
|
2016-03-17 10:51:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return delta.Len() > 0
|
2016-03-17 10:51:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-23 23:57:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func (s *shortcodeHandler) clearDelta() {
|
|
|
|
|
if s == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
s.contentShortcodesDelta = newOrderedMap()
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func (s *shortcodeHandler) contentShortcodesForOutputFormat(f output.Format) *orderedMap {
|
|
|
|
|
contentShortcodesForOuputFormat := newOrderedMap()
|
2017-07-02 04:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
lang := s.p.Lang()
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
for _, key := range s.shortcodes.Keys() {
|
|
|
|
|
shortcodePlaceholder := key.(string)
|
2016-08-01 17:04:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-02 04:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
key := newScKeyFromLangAndOutputFormat(lang, f, shortcodePlaceholder)
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
renderFn, found := s.contentShortcodes.Get(key)
|
2016-08-01 17:04:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if !found {
|
|
|
|
|
key.OutputFormat = ""
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
renderFn, found = s.contentShortcodes.Get(key)
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Fall back to HTML
|
|
|
|
|
if !found && key.Suffix != "html" {
|
|
|
|
|
key.Suffix = "html"
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
renderFn, found = s.contentShortcodes.Get(key)
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !found {
|
|
|
|
|
panic(fmt.Sprintf("Shortcode %q could not be found", shortcodePlaceholder))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
contentShortcodesForOuputFormat.Add(newScKeyFromLangAndOutputFormat(lang, f, shortcodePlaceholder), renderFn)
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return contentShortcodesForOuputFormat
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-19 12:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func (s *shortcodeHandler) executeShortcodesForDelta(p *PageWithoutContent) error {
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
for _, k := range s.contentShortcodesDelta.Keys() {
|
|
|
|
|
render := s.contentShortcodesDelta.getShortcodeRenderer(k)
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
renderedShortcode, err := render()
|
2016-08-01 17:04:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("Failed to execute shortcode in page %q: %s", p.Path(), err)
|
2016-08-01 17:04:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
s.renderedShortcodes[k.(scKey).ShortcodePlaceholder] = renderedShortcode
|
2016-08-01 17:04:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-01 17:04:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func createShortcodeRenderers(shortcodes *orderedMap, p *PageWithoutContent) *orderedMap {
|
2017-05-05 03:24:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
shortcodeRenderers := newOrderedMap()
|
2016-03-17 10:51:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
for _, k := range shortcodes.Keys() {
|
|
|
|
|
v := shortcodes.getShortcode(k)
|
|
|
|
|
prepared := prepareShortcodeForPage(k.(string), v, nil, p)
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
for kk, vv := range prepared {
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
shortcodeRenderers.Add(kk, vv)
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return shortcodeRenderers
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-24 09:11:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
var errShortCodeIllegalState = errors.New("Illegal shortcode state")
|
2015-08-07 14:08:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// pageTokens state:
|
|
|
|
|
// - before: positioned just before the shortcode start
|
|
|
|
|
// - after: shortcode(s) consumed (plural when they are nested)
|
2018-04-23 02:09:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func (s *shortcodeHandler) extractShortcode(ordinal int, pt *pageTokens, p *PageWithoutContent) (*shortcode, error) {
|
|
|
|
|
sc := &shortcode{ordinal: ordinal}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
var isInner = false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var currItem item
|
|
|
|
|
var cnt = 0
|
2018-04-23 02:09:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
var nestedOrdinal = 0
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loop:
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
|
currItem = pt.next()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch currItem.typ {
|
|
|
|
|
case tLeftDelimScWithMarkup, tLeftDelimScNoMarkup:
|
|
|
|
|
next := pt.peek()
|
|
|
|
|
if next.typ == tScClose {
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if cnt > 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
// nested shortcode; append it to inner content
|
|
|
|
|
pt.backup3(currItem, next)
|
2018-04-23 02:09:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
nested, err := s.extractShortcode(nestedOrdinal, pt, p)
|
|
|
|
|
nestedOrdinal++
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
if nested.name != "" {
|
|
|
|
|
s.nameSet[nested.name] = true
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
sc.inner = append(sc.inner, nested)
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
return sc, err
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
sc.doMarkup = currItem.typ == tLeftDelimScWithMarkup
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cnt++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case tRightDelimScWithMarkup, tRightDelimScNoMarkup:
|
|
|
|
|
// we trust the template on this:
|
|
|
|
|
// if there's no inner, we're done
|
|
|
|
|
if !isInner {
|
|
|
|
|
return sc, nil
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case tScClose:
|
2015-03-02 15:23:16 -05:00
|
|
|
|
next := pt.peek()
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if !isInner {
|
|
|
|
|
if next.typ == tError {
|
|
|
|
|
// return that error, more specific
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-02-28 13:24:30 -05:00
|
|
|
|
return sc, fmt.Errorf("Shortcode '%s' in page '%s' has no .Inner, yet a closing tag was provided", next.val, p.FullFilePath())
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-03-02 15:23:16 -05:00
|
|
|
|
if next.typ == tRightDelimScWithMarkup || next.typ == tRightDelimScNoMarkup {
|
|
|
|
|
// self-closing
|
|
|
|
|
pt.consume(1)
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
pt.consume(2)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return sc, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case tText:
|
|
|
|
|
sc.inner = append(sc.inner, currItem.val)
|
|
|
|
|
case tScName:
|
|
|
|
|
sc.name = currItem.val
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// We pick the first template for an arbitrary output format
|
|
|
|
|
// if more than one. It is "all inner or no inner".
|
|
|
|
|
tmpl := getShortcodeTemplateForTemplateKey(scKey{}, sc.name, p.s.Tmpl)
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if tmpl == nil {
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
return sc, fmt.Errorf("Unable to locate template for shortcode %q in page %q", sc.name, p.Path())
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-11-21 14:03:18 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-21 17:29:58 -05:00
|
|
|
|
var err error
|
|
|
|
|
isInner, err = isInnerShortcode(tmpl)
|
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
return sc, fmt.Errorf("Failed to handle template for shortcode %q for page %q: %s", sc.name, p.Path(), err)
|
2015-11-15 14:53:12 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case tScParam:
|
|
|
|
|
if !pt.isValueNext() {
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
} else if pt.peek().typ == tScParamVal {
|
|
|
|
|
// named params
|
|
|
|
|
if sc.params == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
params := make(map[string]string)
|
|
|
|
|
params[currItem.val] = pt.next().val
|
|
|
|
|
sc.params = params
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2015-08-07 14:08:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if params, ok := sc.params.(map[string]string); ok {
|
|
|
|
|
params[currItem.val] = pt.next().val
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2016-03-24 09:11:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return sc, errShortCodeIllegalState
|
2015-08-07 14:08:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// positional params
|
|
|
|
|
if sc.params == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
var params []string
|
|
|
|
|
params = append(params, currItem.val)
|
|
|
|
|
sc.params = params
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2015-08-07 14:08:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if params, ok := sc.params.([]string); ok {
|
|
|
|
|
params = append(params, currItem.val)
|
|
|
|
|
sc.params = params
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2016-03-24 09:11:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return sc, errShortCodeIllegalState
|
2015-08-07 14:08:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case tError, tEOF:
|
|
|
|
|
// handled by caller
|
|
|
|
|
pt.backup()
|
|
|
|
|
break Loop
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return sc, nil
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-19 12:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func (s *shortcodeHandler) extractShortcodes(stringToParse string, p *PageWithoutContent) (string, error) {
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
startIdx := strings.Index(stringToParse, "{{")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// short cut for docs with no shortcodes
|
|
|
|
|
if startIdx < 0 {
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
return stringToParse, nil
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// the parser takes a string;
|
|
|
|
|
// since this is an internal API, it could make sense to use the mutable []byte all the way, but
|
|
|
|
|
// it seems that the time isn't really spent in the byte copy operations, and the impl. gets a lot cleaner
|
|
|
|
|
pt := &pageTokens{lexer: newShortcodeLexer("parse-page", stringToParse, pos(startIdx))}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-30 14:19:46 -05:00
|
|
|
|
result := bp.GetBuffer()
|
|
|
|
|
defer bp.PutBuffer(result)
|
|
|
|
|
//var result bytes.Buffer
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// the parser is guaranteed to return items in proper order or fail, so …
|
|
|
|
|
// … it's safe to keep some "global" state
|
|
|
|
|
var currItem item
|
|
|
|
|
var currShortcode shortcode
|
2018-04-23 02:09:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
var ordinal int
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loop:
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
|
currItem = pt.next()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch currItem.typ {
|
|
|
|
|
case tText:
|
|
|
|
|
result.WriteString(currItem.val)
|
|
|
|
|
case tLeftDelimScWithMarkup, tLeftDelimScNoMarkup:
|
|
|
|
|
// let extractShortcode handle left delim (will do so recursively)
|
|
|
|
|
pt.backup()
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-23 02:09:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
currShortcode, err := s.extractShortcode(ordinal, pt, p)
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if currShortcode.name != "" {
|
|
|
|
|
s.nameSet[currShortcode.name] = true
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
return result.String(), err
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if currShortcode.params == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
currShortcode.params = make([]string, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-19 12:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
placeHolder := s.createShortcodePlaceholder()
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
result.WriteString(placeHolder)
|
2018-04-23 02:09:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
ordinal++
|
2018-04-22 08:07:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
s.shortcodes.Add(placeHolder, currShortcode)
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
case tEOF:
|
|
|
|
|
break Loop
|
|
|
|
|
case tError:
|
|
|
|
|
err := fmt.Errorf("%s:%d: %s",
|
2017-02-21 16:53:37 -05:00
|
|
|
|
p.FullFilePath(), (p.lineNumRawContentStart() + pt.lexer.lineNum() - 1), currItem)
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
currShortcode.err = err
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
return result.String(), err
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-10 14:54:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
return result.String(), nil
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Replace prefixed shortcode tokens (HUGOSHORTCODE-1, HUGOSHORTCODE-2) with the real content.
|
2015-10-20 14:35:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// Note: This function will rewrite the input slice.
|
2015-06-21 07:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func replaceShortcodeTokens(source []byte, prefix string, replacements map[string]string) ([]byte, error) {
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-21 07:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if len(replacements) == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
return source, nil
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-21 07:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
sourceLen := len(source)
|
|
|
|
|
start := 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-08 15:23:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
pre := []byte("HAHA" + prefix)
|
|
|
|
|
post := []byte("HBHB")
|
2015-06-21 07:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
pStart := []byte("<p>")
|
|
|
|
|
pEnd := []byte("</p>")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
k := bytes.Index(source[start:], pre)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for k != -1 {
|
|
|
|
|
j := start + k
|
|
|
|
|
postIdx := bytes.Index(source[j:], post)
|
|
|
|
|
if postIdx < 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
// this should never happen, but let the caller decide to panic or not
|
|
|
|
|
return nil, errors.New("illegal state in content; shortcode token missing end delim")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end := j + postIdx + 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
newVal := []byte(replacements[string(source[j:end])])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Issue #1148: Check for wrapping p-tags <p>
|
|
|
|
|
if j >= 3 && bytes.Equal(source[j-3:j], pStart) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (k+4) < sourceLen && bytes.Equal(source[end:end+4], pEnd) {
|
|
|
|
|
j -= 3
|
|
|
|
|
end += 4
|
2015-01-28 22:11:41 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
Provide (relative) reference funcs & shortcodes.
- `.Ref` and `.RelRef` take a reference (the logical filename for a
page, including extension and/or a document fragment ID) and return
a permalink (or relative permalink) to the referenced document.
- If the reference is a page name (such as `about.md`), the page
will be discovered and the permalink will be returned: `/about/`
- If the reference is a page name with a fragment (such as
`about.md#who`), the page will be discovered and used to add the
`page.UniqueID()` to the resulting fragment and permalink:
`/about/#who:deadbeef`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Node` or `SiteInfo`, it will be returned as is: `#who`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Page`, it will be returned with the page’s unique ID:
`#who:deadbeef`.
- `.*Ref` can be called from either `Node`, `SiteInfo` (e.g.,
`Node.Site`), `Page` objects, or `ShortcodeWithPage` objects in
templates.
- `.*Ref` cannot be used in content, so two shortcodes have been
created to provide the functionality to content: `ref` and `relref`.
These are intended to be used within markup, like `[Who]({{% ref
about.md#who %}})` or `<a href="{{% ref about.md#who %}}">Who</a>`.
- There are also `ref` and `relref` template functions (used to create
the shortcodes) that expect a `Page` or `Node` object and the
reference string (e.g., `{{ relref . "about.md" }}` or `{{
"about.md" | ref . }}`). It actually looks for `.*Ref` as defined on
`Node` or `Page` objects.
- Shortcode handling had to use a *differently unique* wrapper in
`createShortcodePlaceholder` because of the way that the `ref` and
`relref` are intended to be used in content.
2014-11-24 01:15:34 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-20 14:35:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
// This and other cool slice tricks: https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/SliceTricks
|
|
|
|
|
source = append(source[:j], append(newVal, source[end:]...)...)
|
2016-02-25 15:31:22 -05:00
|
|
|
|
start = j
|
2015-06-21 07:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
k = bytes.Index(source[start:], pre)
|
2015-06-22 13:40:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-20 14:35:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-22 13:40:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-20 14:35:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return source, nil
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func getShortcodeTemplateForTemplateKey(key scKey, shortcodeName string, t tpl.TemplateFinder) *tpl.TemplateAdapter {
|
2017-03-27 14:43:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
isInnerShortcodeCache.RLock()
|
|
|
|
|
defer isInnerShortcodeCache.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
var names []string
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
suffix := strings.ToLower(key.Suffix)
|
|
|
|
|
outFormat := strings.ToLower(key.OutputFormat)
|
2017-07-02 04:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
lang := strings.ToLower(key.Lang)
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if outFormat != "" && suffix != "" {
|
2017-07-02 04:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if lang != "" {
|
|
|
|
|
names = append(names, fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s.%s.%s", shortcodeName, lang, outFormat, suffix))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
names = append(names, fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s.%s", shortcodeName, outFormat, suffix))
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if suffix != "" {
|
2017-07-02 04:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
if lang != "" {
|
|
|
|
|
names = append(names, fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s.%s", shortcodeName, lang, suffix))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
names = append(names, fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s", shortcodeName, suffix))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
names = append(names, shortcodeName)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, name := range names {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if x := t.Lookup("shortcodes/" + name); x != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
return x
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if x := t.Lookup("theme/shortcodes/" + name); x != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
return x
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if x := t.Lookup("_internal/shortcodes/" + name); x != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
return x
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
Shortcode rewrite, take 2
This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling.
Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities.
The new flow is:
1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders.
2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered
3. Page is processed
4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes
The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this.
This commit also introduces some other chenges:
1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not:
* `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed.
* `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor)
The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go",
which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better.
2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples.
The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning:
* The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not.
* To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner`
Fixes #565
Fixes #480
Fixes #461
And probably some others.
2014-10-27 16:48:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-06 14:15:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-27 14:43:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
func renderShortcodeWithPage(tmpl tpl.Template, data *ShortcodeWithPage) string {
|
2015-01-30 14:19:46 -05:00
|
|
|
|
buffer := bp.GetBuffer()
|
|
|
|
|
defer bp.PutBuffer(buffer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-09 08:25:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
isInnerShortcodeCache.RLock()
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
err := tmpl.Execute(buffer, data)
|
2016-04-09 08:25:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
isInnerShortcodeCache.RUnlock()
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
2017-05-09 12:37:43 -04:00
|
|
|
|
data.Page.s.Log.ERROR.Printf("error processing shortcode %q for page %q: %s", tmpl.Name(), data.Page.Path(), err)
|
2014-01-29 17:50:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return buffer.String()
|
2013-07-04 11:32:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
}
|