mirror of
https://github.com/Brandon-Rozek/website.git
synced 2024-12-01 15:03:13 -05:00
137 lines
No EOL
5.1 KiB
Markdown
137 lines
No EOL
5.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: 2095
|
|
title: Uniformity of Math.random()
|
|
date: 2017-03-07T21:50:52+00:00
|
|
author: Brandon Rozek
|
|
aliases:
|
|
- /2017/03/uniformity-math-random/
|
|
permalink: /2017/03/uniformity-math-random/
|
|
medium_post:
|
|
- 'O:11:"Medium_Post":11:{s:16:"author_image_url";N;s:10:"author_url";N;s:11:"byline_name";N;s:12:"byline_email";N;s:10:"cross_link";N;s:2:"id";N;s:21:"follower_notification";N;s:7:"license";N;s:14:"publication_id";N;s:6:"status";N;s:3:"url";N;}'
|
|
mf2_syndicate-to:
|
|
- 'a:1:{i:0;s:4:"none";}'
|
|
mf2_cite:
|
|
- 'a:4:{s:9:"published";s:25:"0000-01-01T00:00:00+00:00";s:7:"updated";s:25:"0000-01-01T00:00:00+00:00";s:8:"category";a:1:{i:0;s:0:"";}s:6:"author";a:0:{}}'
|
|
format: aside
|
|
tags: ["Statistics"]
|
|
---
|
|
There are many cases where websites use random number generators to influence some sort of page behavior. One test to ensure the quality of a random number generator is to see if after many cases, the numbers produced follow a uniform distribution.
|
|
|
|
<!--more-->
|
|
|
|
Today, I will compare Internet Explorer 11, Chrome, and Firefox on a Windows 7 machine and report my results.
|
|
|
|
## Hypothesis
|
|
|
|
H0: The random numbers outputted follow the uniform distribution
|
|
|
|
HA: The random numbers outputted do not follow the uniform distribution
|
|
|
|
## Gathering Data
|
|
|
|
I wrote a small [website](http://share.zeropointshift.com/files/2017/03/random.html) and obtained my data by getting the CSV outputted when I use IE11, Firefox, and Chrome.
|
|
|
|
The website works by producing a random number using <code class='language-javascript'>Math.random()</code> between 1 and 1000 inclusive and calls the function 1,000,000 times. Storing it’s results in a file
|
|
|
|
This website produces a file with all the numbers separated by a comma. We want these commas to be replaced by newlines. To do so, we can run a simple command in the terminal
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
grep -oE '[0-9]+' Random.csv > Random_corrected.csv
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Do this with all three files and make sure to keep track of which is which.
|
|
|
|
Here are a copy of my files for [Firefox](https://brandonrozek.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Firefox_corrected.csv), [Chrome](https://brandonrozek.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Chrome_corrected-1.csv), and [IE11](https://brandonrozek.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/IE11_corrected.csv)
|
|
|
|
## Check Conditions
|
|
|
|
Since we’re interested in if the random values occur uniformly, we need to perform a Chi-Square test for Goodness of Fit. With every test comes some assumptions
|
|
|
|
<u>Counted Data Condition:</u> The data can be converted from quantatative to count data.
|
|
|
|
<u>Independence Assumption:</u> One random value does not affect another.
|
|
|
|
<u>Expected Cell Frequency Condition:</u> The expected counts are going to be 10000
|
|
|
|
Since all of the conditions are met, we can use the Chi-square test of Goodness of Fit
|
|
|
|
## Descriptive Statistics
|
|
|
|
For the rest of the article, we will use R for analysis. Looking at the histograms for the three browsers below. The random numbers all appear to occur uniformly
|
|
|
|
```R
|
|
rm(list=ls())
|
|
chrome = read.csv("~/Chrome_corrected.csv", header = F)
|
|
firefox = read.csv("~/Firefox_corrected.csv", header = F)
|
|
ie11 = read.csv("~/IE11_corrected.csv", header = F)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```R
|
|
hist(ie11$V1, main = "Distribution of Random Values for IE11", xlab = "Random Value")
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```R
|
|
hist(firefox$V1, main = "Distribution of Random Values for Firefox", xlab = "Random Value")
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```R
|
|
hist(chrome$V1, main = "Distribution of Random Values for Chrome", xlab = "Random Value")
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Chi-Square Test
|
|
|
|
Before we run our test, we need to convert the quantatative data to count data by using the plyr package
|
|
|
|
```R
|
|
#Transform to count data
|
|
library(plyr)
|
|
chrome_count = count(chrome)
|
|
firefox_count = count(firefox)
|
|
ie11_count = count(ie11)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Run the tests
|
|
|
|
```R
|
|
# Chi-Square Test for Goodness-of-Fit
|
|
chrome_test = chisq.test(chrome_count$freq)
|
|
firefox_test = chisq.test(firefox_count$freq)
|
|
ie11_test = chisq.test(ie11_count$freq)
|
|
|
|
# Test results
|
|
chrome_test
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
As you can see in the test results below, we fail to reject the null hypothesis at a 5% significance level because all of the p-values are above 0.05.
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
## Chi-squared test for given probabilities
|
|
##
|
|
## data: chrome_count$freq
|
|
## X-squared = 101.67, df = 99, p-value = 0.4069
|
|
|
|
`firefox_test`
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
## Chi-squared test for given probabilities
|
|
##
|
|
## data: firefox_count$freq
|
|
## X-squared = 105.15, df = 99, p-value = 0.3172
|
|
|
|
`ie11_test`
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
## Chi-squared test for given probabilities
|
|
##
|
|
## data: ie11_count$freq
|
|
## X-squared = 78.285, df = 99, p-value = 0.9384
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
At a 5% significance level, we fail to obtain enough evidence to suggest that the distribution of random number is not uniform. This is a good thing since it shows us that our random number generators give all numbers an equal chance of being represented. We can use `Math.random()` with ease of mind. |