brozek/website
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Brandon-Rozek/website.git synced 2025-10-09 14:31:13 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Activity

Syndicated to Medium

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Brandon Rozek 2023-01-25 13:20:29 -05:00
parent 17e7209a41
commit bfa4e52c0b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 26E457DA82C9F480
15 changed files with 95 additions and 75 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
content/blog/accidentally-reinforcing-model-predictions-inaturalist-seek.md
View file

@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
---
title: "Accidentally Reinforcing Model Predictions in iNaturalist with Seek"
date: 2022-10-04T11:38:03-04:00
draft: false
tags: []
date: 2022-10-04 11:38:03-04:00
draft: false
math: false
medium_enabled: true
medium_post_id: 6ecb481df869
tags: []
title: Accidentally Reinforcing Model Predictions in iNaturalist with Seek
---
I [previously wrote](/blog/identifying-plants-with-inaturalist/) about using Seek to identify organisms and then uploading them separately to iNaturalist. Though after some thought I believe that by only uploading photos that Seek has blessed as knowing, I may be reinforcing peculiar features of the dataset and hence the model.
@ -21,6 +22,4 @@ Does this mean that uploading photos classified by Seek is redundant? No! Becaus
For the image itself, one recommendation I have is the following. Take the image that Seek recommends for the classification, and then take one or two different angles of the same organism. Within iNaturalist, you can upload multiple photos for a single organism.
Now go and take some pictures :)
Now go and take some pictures :)