mirror of
https://github.com/Brandon-Rozek/website.git
synced 2025-10-10 06:51:13 +00:00
Added medium syndication metadata
This commit is contained in:
parent
79329aae66
commit
387dd491b1
30 changed files with 175 additions and 134 deletions
|
@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: "Intensional Logic Extends First Order"
|
||||
date: 2022-02-26T20:33:38-05:00
|
||||
date: 2022-02-26 20:33:38-05:00
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
math: true
|
||||
medium_enabled: true
|
||||
medium_post_id: 8e07b68aa8f5
|
||||
tags: []
|
||||
title: Intensional Logic Extends First Order
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The second brightest object in the sky is known as the morgensteorra (morning star) and æfensteorra (evening star). Later on this object became known as Venus. [(Wikipedia)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_in_culture)
|
||||
|
@ -21,4 +22,4 @@ In first order logic, we can then deduce the following:
|
|||
$$
|
||||
B(\text{morgensteorra} = \text{venus})
|
||||
$$
|
||||
But does that make sense? It is possible to hold a belief that Venus is the evening star while not holding a belief that Venus is the morning star. Therefore, we cannot treat belief as a traditional relation symbol. Issues like these give birth to intensional reasoning and from that modal logic.
|
||||
But does that make sense? It is possible to hold a belief that Venus is the evening star while not holding a belief that Venus is the morning star. Therefore, we cannot treat belief as a traditional relation symbol. Issues like these give birth to intensional reasoning and from that modal logic.
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue