2020-04-11 20:49:08 -04:00
---
title: "Quick Python: Concurrent Futures"
date: 2020-04-11T20:40:28-04:00
draft: false
2022-01-02 14:24:29 -05:00
tags: ["Python"]
2023-01-05 14:04:45 -05:00
medium_enabled: true
2020-04-11 20:49:08 -04:00
---
Another way to perform concurrency in python is to use the `concurrent.futures` module.
```python
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, ProcessPoolExecutor
def add(x, y):
return x + y
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=4) as executor:
future = executor.submit(add, 1, 2)
result = future.result(timeout=30) # unit: seconds
```
If `max_workers=None` then it will default to the number of processors on the machine multiplied by 5.
If `timeout=None` then there is no time limit applied.
You can also apply a function to a list or iterables
```python
def double(x):
return 2 * x
with ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
2020-04-11 22:10:08 -04:00
future = executor.map(function_handle, [1, 2, 3])
2020-04-11 20:49:08 -04:00
result = future.result()
```
Instead of threads, it is also possible to spawn processes to side-step the global interpreter lock. The documentation warns that only picklable objects can be executed and returned though.
```python
def add(x, y):
return x + y
with ProcessPoolExecutor() as executor:
future = executor.submit(add, 1, 2)
result = future.result()
```